4 ms·
It’s not a human and so the entire argument comparing it to one is moot. It’s a program on a machine and doesn’t have rights, this anti-human way of thinking i
by edgyquant 3y ago
It’s not a human and so the entire argument comparing it to one is moot. It’s a program on a machine and doesn’t have rights, this anti-human way of thinking is seriously fucking scary.
- ben_w 3y agoThe post you're responding to didn't call them human. Nor alive. Just "intelligent", and just as intelligence isn't required of life so I have no reason to think intelligence itself requires life. These things are indeed "a program on a machine and doesn’t have rights", but what I find scary is that rights aren't part of the rules of the universe, they're merely laws, created and enforced (to the extent that they are at all) by humans.
- CatWChainsaw 3y agoAs Max Tegmark said in his recent interview with Lex Fridman, a lot of the technology being developed now, and how it's being talked about and how it's used, is anti-life.