3 ms·
Can't both be done? Can't society provide for both in immediate danger as well as those suffering less? Do we need to stop tending for people's mental health b
by gchamonlive 3y ago
Can't both be done? Can't society provide for both in immediate danger as well as those suffering less?
Do we need to stop tending for people's mental health because many are not eating?
Maybe the effort involved in categorising, understanding and prioritising suffering would be better used... well... actually reducing suffering.
Because when we think like this we risk dismanteling efforts that are really important, like protecting other animals from abandonment or abuse, or protecting the environment, because we risk putting them in lower hierarchical priority compared to our own most immediate form of suffering.
- Podgajski 3y agoApparently we can’t. So I’m looking at this as a form of triage. At the very least, we can help those who are suffering the most, right? Because right now I’m neither being treated for my mental illness or my homelessness so there you go. But yes, many people would rather protect and house animals than protect and house people. So I guess as humans we should have the same priorities, no? But if you think protecting the environment is more important than providing people shelter I don’t know what to say. And in fact, I am going to state that it is easier to care about the climate than to provide people with housing, which is why people focus on the formal rather than the later.