7 ms·
> > It can't just crawl Wikipedia because Fair Use in Wikipedia doesn't constitute Fair use for a commercial AI model. > Why not? Because it’s tantamount to
by FridgeSeal 3y ago
> > It can't just crawl Wikipedia because Fair Use in Wikipedia doesn't constitute Fair use for a commercial AI model.
> Why not?
Because it’s tantamount to lying and deceptive conduct? It’s like asking for a licence to use something non-commercially, getting a hold of it, and conveniently deciding 10 minutes later, that you’re actually going to become a re-seller for all this stuff you have. Or going to the soup kitchen because you don’t want to pay your private chef tonight.
- bhickey 3y agoThis analogy doesn't work. Fair use is an affirmative defense to copyright infringement claims. Entities that are training models largely claim that their uses are transformative and fall under fair use. Creative Commons, among others, agrees with this position. [0] If they're right, it simply doesn't matter what license a copyright holder is offering. There are competing legal theories and no one can say how courts are going to rule on these issues. Smart lawyers who work on copyright and AI don't know. Technologists certainly don't know. [0] https://creativecommons.org/2023/02/17/fair-use-training-generative-ai/ https://creativecommons.org/2023/02/17/fair-use-training-gen...
- yokem55 3y agoThen there is the argument that the rules around fair use aren't even reached because the training of the model doesn't even do anything that requires a fair use exemption.