4 ms·
You, because you released the song and took the royalties? I don’t think every type of art can be compared against each other though, as there have been numerou
by kredd 3y ago
You, because you released the song and took the royalties? I don’t think every type of art can be compared against each other though, as there have been numerous precedents specifically for music, some for paintings, and some for photography with their own nuances.
I still think people who are concerned that art related copyright will stifle generative AI should fight copyright laws directly. But that’s a harder pill to swallow since it will cause multi-industry wide havoc.
- atq2119 3y agoPart of what's interesting here is that generative AI makes it very easy to unknowingly and unintentionally get on the wrong side of copyright law, which is something that wasn't really possible before. That's something which, IMHO, should be acknowledged by the law.
- Baldbvrhunter 3y agoAsk George Harrison about "My Sweet Lord" which cost him $587,000 for his unconcious infringement.
- kredd 3y agoIf you haven’t seen Mickey Mouse, Googled “cartoon mouse”, accidentally used it as inspiration, made T-Shirts, and sold them, Disney would be after you as well.