2 ms·
> "assessment" is base upon a single image Incorrect. This assessment is based on the actual data. > https://www.chernobyl-international.com/ https://www.ch
by mpweiher 3y ago
> "assessment" is base upon a single image
Incorrect. This assessment is based on the actual data.
> https://www.chernobyl-international.com/ https://www.chernobyl-international.com/
A "charity" that's a .com domain and has an illegal "consent" form. (Not all consent forms are illegal, but that one clearly is). Yeah, sure what more reliable source could there possibly be?
I actually went through the reports by the WHO. The official reports they did every 10 years after the accident. Did you? Were you even aware of those reports? They are on the WHO website.
Each subsequent report lowered the estimate of "negative health effects" from the previous report by an order of magnitude. Yes, that's a factor of 10. Each one, and there have been a number of them. By the last couple, the negative health effects of the evacuation were significantly higher than those of the accident itself. Which has also been the case in Japan.
> > And the other thing that people don't understand is the energy density of nuclear.
> Sure they do. They don't care because you know what's even better? The sun in the sky, for example...
Thanks for so skillfully demonstrating how the lack of understanding of energy density looks like in practice! Very much appreciated.
> [Ukraine] How the hell is this supposed to be an argument FOR nuclear?!?
Everything you say should be, in your world, the best reasons for getting OUT of nuclear. Yet they are not just not getting out, they want to expand.
Maybe they know something you do not?
>> The countries with the most experience with nuclear accidents ... favor nuclear.
> ...greenwash, rip off, renationalize ...
To which you have exactly no response, except that they must all be corrupt and ignorant. Really? That's your position? You know better, the people who actually do have first hand knowledge and hundreds if not thousands of experts know nothing and are all corrupt.
Hmm..
Or maybe, just maybe, they know something you do not.
- Krasnol 3y agoThis is just the first charity I got from google. There are a dozen more. It's ridiculous that the freaking consent form of a website is your argument now. How are you not ashamed, posting this? And no I didn't go through the WHO report (just like you didn't....you didn't even know why Belarus is a topic here so stop lying!), I know people PERSONALLY who are affected by that. Now what? What graphic will you pull out now? In my previous comment, I brought up several sources to support my arguments. You have nothing here. Nothing besides the disgusting attitude you bring up towards those who suffer the technology you worship.