It's quite ironic really, that the article sneers over 'hype' and proceeds to do, unabashedly, just the same. I think Quora is a good product, it did not get th

It's quite ironic really, that the article sneers over 'hype' and proceeds to do, unabashedly, just the same. I think Quora is a good product, it did not get the stickiness it deserved, and they tried well by adding features that brought in some sticky bits. The article is completely elusive on the numbers, and mostly claims provided to a journalist that ate it up without question. As Steve Jobs once said, 'If you sell a lot of something, you'd want to tell the whole world about it'. Using this hype to fuel a better-than-you valuation created out of thin air is sad. Hardly relates to the noble cause that Quora is purportedly after.