3 ms·

I think it is easy to dismiss because you should always keep squishy humans away from the unthinking machines. If they are always separated during routine opera

I think it is easy to dismiss because you should always keep squishy humans away from the unthinking machines. If they are always separated during routine operation, you have eliminated potential failure modes that could result in a fatal injury. Sure, engineer the machines to immediately halt if a human is detected, but also design the system so that close physical proximity is never required.

jauntywundrkind 3y ago
Have you done anything other than restate the initial FUD? I think I have gone through efforts to elaborate why I think high reliability is achievable over wireless systems. It seems irrational to me to hate wireless so. If I were a squishy human in a factory, I feel like I would far far far prefer some highly reliable central systems with near godlike omniscience of the factory floor watch things, & use well quantified known wireless channels (albeit no WiFi that exists today, without a lot of other promises) to communicate, than rely on individual robots relying on embodied knowledge. You all sound like cranks to me, given how incredibly fantastically super seriously I would want the former, not the latter.