> But it's important to remember that no copyright at all would hurt small and medium creators immensely. This doesn't refute the tweet. You're just saying you

> But it's important to remember that no copyright at all would hurt small and medium creators immensely. This doesn't refute the tweet. You're just saying you want a monetization strategy that enables an information business model that you like (small/medium creators) instead of one that you don't like. It's still not a moral right, and your belief that the law should help artists is not innately superior to a belief that the law should help Disney or that the law should help corn farmers. Additionally, it's arguable that copyright is needed for small/medium creators to succeed. Most successful independent creators monetize through patreon or personal commissions, neither of which are actually hindered by lack of copyright.