I think it's generally the opposite, and the rankings kind of validate my general model of companies. There's a continuum of "good/bad" to customers & "good/ba

I think it's generally the opposite, and the rankings kind of validate my general model of companies. There's a continuum of "good/bad" to customers & "good/bad" to employees, and companies are rarely good to both. Some of the most popular consumer facing brands are terrible places to work. One cynical reason may be that they know there is an unlimited supply of bushy tailed workers ready to replace you once they exhaust your will to live. Another less cynical reason might be that to create the best products requires the hardest work, most competition, and generally it burns people out. It's worth going into the interview process understanding the risk/reward profile. Some companies are high stress & turnover, but at least pay you for the hazard. Others not so much.