4 ms·

"Firefox out of the box indeed does not cause broken websites" .. for you. I regulary ran across something that does not work or has a broken style. And I know

"Firefox out of the box indeed does not cause broken websites" .. for you. I regulary ran across something that does not work or has a broken style. And I know how to turn UO off. And why should that be a surprise? FF has way less manpower than Chrome. (And even fired lots of engineers, to raise the CEO bonus) Chrome leads the way and probably the vast majority developes for chrome and with chrome dev tools. So most of the time FF works, but not always. And performance is just worse, but not noticable on a desktop and on mobile it is offset by the working adblock. Meaning perceived performance is usually better, because ads are blocked, unlike in chrome mobile.

beeboobaa 3y ago
This has absolutely not been my experience. Must be a different extension you installed.
- hutzlibu 3y ago
  Or I just visit different websites?
  - 01nate 3y ago
    Not the worst idea to avoid a website for breaking in FF (or take a chance to touch grass), but unfortunately when you can't pay your credit card bill or need something for your work and it only works in Chromium it can't be avoided.
lcof 3y ago
Then we can compare brave and firefox in terms of speed. I don’t see any noticeable performance difference (I use both on linux and macos)
- hutzlibu 3y ago
  Then ... maybe have a look at some numbers: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-Chrome-109-Benchmarks https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-Chrome-109-Benchmarks And sadly it can be worse, with my quite complex app, that I absolutely did not tailor for chrome, but gone out of my way to also support FF - the result is that chrome is just 3x faster.
  - lcof 3y ago
    Thank you, never looked at these. The benchmarks show a big margin, but still, I use both daily and do not notice such a gap