5 ms·
> On desktop, various Firefox updates would change my settings subtly and nag me about features I had no interest in If Firefox suited my needs 100% as well as
by wharvle 3y ago
> On desktop, various Firefox updates would change my settings subtly and nag me about features I had no interest in
If Firefox suited my needs 100% as well as Safari, this is why I’d still not use it. God damn is it noisy. You’re a browser, I have no interest in engaging with you more than necessary, whatever-I-was-trying-to-do is what I care about. Please stop acting like a kid who’s not getting enough attention. It’s off-putting.
- temp0826 3y agoIt's been a long time since I've had a fresh install of ff (I do recall some notification bars in the window you have to close out), but as a very longtime user, I have no idea what you're talking about...example?
- wharvle 3y agoThey pop new tabs, little “hint” boxes, et c, all the time. It’s the kind of thing that’s easy to become blind to as a power user (but is annoying if you do notice it), but that murders UX for lots of folks.
- temp0826 3y agoUnless you mean the random tabs when an extension e.g. tampermonkey gets updated and shows a change log I don't think I've seen what you mentioned. Definitely nothing "all the time".
- Semaphor 3y agoBeen using it since quantum, it happens after some updates, recently there was some modal about some feature I didn’t care about, and I had to click twice to close it. That was only a few weeks ago.
- pivo 3y ago> God damn is it noisy What is this noise you're referring to? I'm 90% Firefox and 10% Safari and I don't understand this comment.
- mrweasel 3y agoI kinda do. Safari feels very much like a simplistic browser, but a damn good one, except when it's not. Firefox tried to do a lot, tons of features baked in, Safari outsources a lot to the operating system and as a result the interface and interaction becomes simpler, but less flexible. The primary reason I don't use it 100%, but 90/10 like you, is due to extensions and those few sites that doesn't work in Firefox.
- jwells89 3y agoAnd much of the “noisiness” stems from tooltips, popups, etc explaining changes and additions. I can see where some users might want those but it should be possible to disable those entirely, or at least make them more “quiet” (e.g. a notification icon with red news count pip on the new tab screen where changes can be seen at the user's leisure).
- pivo 3y ago> Safari outsources a lot to the operating system and as a result the interface and interaction becomes simpler, but less flexible. Yes, definitely agree with that. But I think of "noise" as stuff that interrupts your normal interaction with web sites and in that regard I don't think Firefox is particularly noisy. There are definitely a lot of features, settings and extensions with Firefox and while I don't use very many of them I do really appreciate the ones that I do use.
- mvdtnz 3y agoI know what he's talking about. Firefox has constant nag screens. I just restarted Firefox and got two separate nags[1]. I am certain that within the next week it will nag me for at least one more thing. Maybe it'll want me to try Pocket, or sign in with a Mozilla account, or set up sync, or the absolute worst offender - when I launch the browser it will say "heyyyy I gotta update and I treat this like it's 1998 so you'll need to wait, and then I'll need to restart". Firefox is VERY naggy. [1] https://imgur.com/a/dLr6E0C https://imgur.com/a/dLr6E0C
- pivo 3y ago
- unethical_ban 3y agoOnce every three months, one gets an upgrade tab showing release notes. Upon occasion (and I mean, occasion, not regularly) they may try a new feature like Sync, save for later, etc. Once I get the browser installed and running, what you describe matches 0% of my experience with it.
- dvngnt_ 3y agochrome has to be worse. now there's that ad privacy option that you have to remember to change
- echelon 3y agoGoogle and Apple get to engage you frequently all the time for free. You have no choice in the matter. Every surface is theirs.
- wharvle 3y agoFirefox doesn’t need to get me to “engage” when I’m already in their browser.
- echelon 3y agoFirefox needs to make money.
- wharvle 3y agoThat’s why I have to change the default search engine. Most of what they’re nagging me about won’t even make them money. It’s marketing-changelog pages nobody reads. They could save some money by keeping text change logs where people who care can find them, and dropping those altogether.
- Dalewyn 3y agoIndeed, their CEO wants her fat paycheck.[1] [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_Baker#Negative_salary-achievements_correlation_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_Baker#Negative_salary...
- echelon 3y agoShe needs to go. 100% of the money should go to engineering and (actually skilled and focused) product people.