4 ms·
If the police have a reasonable suspicion then they should have no problem getting a warrant. If they cant clear that bar then maybe they shouldn’t get that in
by alemanek 3y ago
If the police have a reasonable suspicion then they should have no problem getting a warrant. If they cant clear that bar then maybe they shouldn’t get that information.
Rules aren’t just for people you like or approve of.
- hollerith 3y agoSo you're not curious at all about how this "information leak" you probably did not know about before today could bite you personally? For you, this conversation is only about public policy and how you and I might change it -- and not at all about how you personally (or someone you care about) could modify your purchasing behavior to reduce your vulnerability to adverse governmental action? I agree with the legal principle you describe, but to me that is the less interesting angle because public policy is hard to change whereas my own behavior is much easier to change. It is amusing that I cannot have a conversation here about any other angle without getting downvoted by people opposed to any writings that could possibly be useful to the opposing side in the public debate over the one angle they want to talk (write) about.
- xxpor 3y agoThe standard for a warrant is probable cause, not reasonable suspicion.
- ClumsyPilot 3y agoI think OP’s point is that, without privacy, there is no standard at all.