3 ms·
> is not sufficient to make the machine accessible on the internet unless the wallet machine is publicly addressable, in which case I think running untrusted co
by formerly_proven 3y ago
> is not sufficient to make the machine accessible on the internet unless the wallet machine is publicly addressable, in which case I think running untrusted code is the least of the dev's concerns
Whole raison d’etre of IPv6 is to enable that.
- Volundr 3y agoEvery router I've met still runs a firewall that blocks incoming traffic by default IPv6 or no. My guess on this kind of thing would generally be that the infected computer reacher out to a service controlled by the hacker to establish the shell and the reporter misunderstood, or that the dev connected to a VPN controlled by the attacker, effectively bypassing the firewall, otherwise something is really badly configured on the devs end.
- beardedwizard 3y agoMost shells are connect back, ie the reach out to a known address to deal with NAT, etc