> your personal example would likely not be a quality argument in any case Uh, thanks? > in this case the the country that (hopefully) designed their digital

> your personal example would likely not be a quality argument in any case Uh, thanks? > in this case the the country that (hopefully) designed their digital nomad program to the benefit of its population Well, I can agree and just note that this is orthogonal to the issue I'm raising: It's a rich people visa and as such is not helpful to many people who objectively qualify for a "digital nomad" moniker, so there's a mismatch between the name and the function.