That's not what I mean. Boil this down to it's logical conclusion. If a cop arrests anyone for something that is deemed after the fact unjustifiable, they shoul

That's not what I mean. Boil this down to it's logical conclusion. If a cop arrests anyone for something that is deemed after the fact unjustifiable, they should similarly be held liable for damages. I mean, why stop at taking pictures? Is it not just as much an inconvenience to be arbitrarily arrested for burglary? Throw in the culture of the police corps - and you could see a lot more "not my job" type behavior from the police. This sort of law could very well be interpreted as a slap by an ungrateful populace. I'm just saying there is a balance here. Us vs. them isn't likely to result in improvement. This law seems very knee-jerky to me.