The article hints at a lot of things that aren’t explicitly explained. They blame “the market” but don’t really get into the cause and effect. It sounds like t

The article hints at a lot of things that aren’t explicitly explained. They blame “the market” but don’t really get into the cause and effect. It sounds like there is some kind of regulation preventing a normal kind of bankruptcy where the company is not able to continue operating and find either new owners or get rid of its liabilities. Why would the prices be forced to be so low if the article also admits there’s demand for the drugs? That another company then wants to pick up making them again suggests it’s possible to make them profitably