4 ms·
I looked at the several of the links (1,2,3,5 to be exact) and unfortunately they did not support your claim, so I didn’t bother with the rest. That is, unless
by shwouchk 3y ago
I looked at the several of the links (1,2,3,5 to be exact) and unfortunately they did not support your claim, so I didn’t bother with the rest.
That is, unless you start with the premise that an app store on a closed platform must be open. Unfortunately this premise is the point of contention and is part of what you need to show in order for said practices to be abuse.
Happy new year.
- smoldesu 3y agoIf you're going to loop back around to contention, then pick a side or explain why Europe is wrong. Simply saying that something is controversial is not an argument. Europe's ruling is not a double-standard, it specifically targets Apple-scale businesses while leaving other platforms like game consoles untouched. If you feel like that's contentious, it's your job to prove that other manufacturers are abusing monopoly power in the same way Apple does.
- shwouchk 3y agoI’m sorry, this argument is not worth my time. Please go vent your anger elsewhere.