2 ms·

You hit the nail on the head. "True cost of using wind and solar to meet demand was $272 and $472 per MWh [pdf]" source: https://web.archive.org/web/20220916

You hit the nail on the head. "True cost of using wind and solar to meet demand was $272 and $472 per MWh [pdf]" source: https://web.archive.org/web/20220916003958/https://files.americanexperiment.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/The-High-Cost-of-100-Percent-Carbon-Free-Electricity-by-2040-in-Minnesota.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20220916003958/https://files.ame...

pfdietz 3y ago
This is utter bullshit. It probably used obsolete cost numbers and assumed batteries are the only storage mode used.
- ETH_start 3y ago
  On what basis do you assume it's bullshit? This is a very emotional/irrational reaction to a study.
  - pfdietz 3y ago
    It's in gross disagreement with figures and modeling I've seen elsewhere.
    - ETH_start 3y ago
      Can I see the other figures/models?