3 ms·
>It absolutely was No, there is no such absolute requirement that "newly added" functions cannot be stabilized. Off the top of my head: https://github.com/rust
by Arnavion 3y ago
>It absolutely was
No, there is no such absolute requirement that "newly added" functions cannot be stabilized. Off the top of my head: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111544 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111544 `OsStr::as_encoded_bytes` was proposed in 2023-05, finished being implemented in 2023-07, stabilized in 2023-09, and released in 2023-11.
>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38801228 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38801228
The reason attr of "newly added" is the reason to *mark the function unstable* when it was implemented. It's not the reason to *prevent it from being stabilized.*
- LoganDark 3y ago> No, there is no such absolute requirement that "newly added" functions cannot be stabilized. I never said so.
- Arnavion 3y agoYou did, and it was already covered in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38801686 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38801686 so I'm not going to repeat it.
- shepherdjerred 3y agoThanks for validating my comment. I thought I was going crazy in that thread.