My and the patent examiner's reading of the patent is far less charitable to Apple than yours, and I'm still at a loss as to how one can poorly summarize the pa

My and the patent examiner's reading of the patent is far less charitable to Apple than yours, and I'm still at a loss as to how one can poorly summarize the patent to exclude the relevant and obvious details showing apparent infringement, but here we are. Is there any evidence you feel would convince people that the patent examiner was wrong in awarding the patent which, at the moment, is valid? Any evidence you feel convincingly disputes the record we have of Apple's interactions with Masimo? Empty denials would be pretty unconvincing, and I'm not sure we even have that.