5 ms·
How does this differ from https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ (which already has a robust software eco
by losteric 3y ago
How does this differ from https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/ (which already has a robust software ecosystem), or the multitude of various "git standards/best practices" already in existence?
What about this "revolutionizes" software development or "enable" faster iteration, reliability beyond clear commits in any other form?
- andrewjf 3y agoAuthor doesn’t appear to have heard of conventional commits at all, so this is pretty funny that it’s exactly the same thing with a very slight syntax.
- Reclaimer 3y agoThey are all horrendous and useless and not actually used in production. If the inventor of these convential commit protocols don't have 7,000 commits they're framework sucks
- Reclaimer 3y agoFirst, WARP's focus is on speed and accelerating cycle time so it's flexible and not rigid. 2nd, defining the change to the exact module allows people to see what changes were made to what function or class. WARP has enabled me to acquire 7,143 contributions in half of a year with 100s of projects.