The article states that usage is roughly flat. That said, I would add to the title: ", but not impact-free"; reducing our collective use is important. We can ha

The article states that usage is roughly flat. That said, I would add to the title: ", but not impact-free"; reducing our collective use is important. We can have great lives on much less energy (says someone who has benefited immensely from cheap and abundant energy... easy for me to say, but it's still important to say it, unless it's obvious to everyone?).