3 ms·
The OP doesn’t read like a ChatGPT comment to me, though maybe I’m easily fooled. It has a bit more personality (“High-theory”, putting “just” in quotes as an i
by jdelman 3y ago
The OP doesn’t read like a ChatGPT comment to me, though maybe I’m easily fooled. It has a bit more personality (“High-theory”, putting “just” in quotes as an ironic wink). It’s tongue-in-cheek, not nonsensical.
- kevinventullo 3y ago“High-theory stuff” in fact. I think it’d take a fairly specific prompt to elicit the word “stuff”.
- GuB-42 3y agoAlso, unless cleverly prompted, ChatGPT normally has a positive attitude. This post looks too negative and dismissive for a typical ChatGPT answer: "worse", "disastrous", "stuff", "don't bother", etc... It follows the general construction of a ChatGPT answer though.
- callalex 3y ago>It follows the general construction of a ChatGPT answer though. In my English education in public school in California, it was hammered into my head quite strictly that A Paragraph has a very specific structure, and that no parts can be rearranged or even omitted. Thankfully I have moved on from thinking about the English language that way, but it’s not shocking to me that many real people write with a similar structure because they were taught that it was the objectively correct way to communicate in written form.