> All my numbers above are including load factors... Nope. >>> Excluding load factors we have 440 GW of wind and solar vs. 8.3 GW > I never said nuclear proj

> All my numbers above are including load factors... Nope. >>> Excluding load factors we have 440 GW of wind and solar vs. 8.3 GW > I never said nuclear projects don't exist Yes you did. >>> I've heard rumors that you can do both at the same time. >> I heard facts that people don't so. > only that their net added capacity is negligible compared to wind and solar. Nope, see above. But they are also not negligible. > ...and did for years now. And I've told you a number of times now that the historical under-investment in nuclear the last few decades or so is a well-known fact that in no way contradicts the fact that policy has now changed. Linearly projecting a past trend into the future is ... unwise. Particularly if there has been a major policy shift. Which there has. Arguing that the policy shift that just happened hasn't happened because it had no effect in the past is even less wise.