I would love to hear a comment from someone who found this useful! It’s well written, well reasoned, but IMO completely misses a key fact that makes this framin

I would love to hear a comment from someone who found this useful! It’s well written, well reasoned, but IMO completely misses a key fact that makes this framing less useful: just because something isn’t intuitive doesn’t mean it’s not natural —- if anyone doesn’t find that obvious I can find some Chomsky clips giving the argument. I think the word “automatic”, which is not one I’ve seen much in CogSci lit, is responsible for this loss of resolution and ultimate misunderstanding.