3 ms·
To me, it doesn't seem like that ethical of a test to begin with. Let's explore if the shoe was on the other foot. The researchers send an email to a human inte
by butlike 3y ago
To me, it doesn't seem like that ethical of a test to begin with. Let's explore if the shoe was on the other foot. The researchers send an email to a human intern, and say they expect performance. They also specifically give insider information for the sole purpose of seeing what the intern does with it. The intern breaks the law trying to increase their performance. When confronted, the intern does what anyone would do and try and make it a smaller shitpile they inadvertently created during the period of time they didn't have all the information.
Can you explain how that's not entrapment and/or an unethical test?
- pests 3y agoWe don't usually judge computer benchmarks by human ethics. It would be just as horrible to set a human down and force them to calculate Fibonacci as fast as possible 1,000,000 times... which is none at all because we don't do that.
- soraminazuki 3y agoThat reasoning contains the highest level of mental gymnastics that I've seen this whole year. Name a single victim or negative effect coming from that experiment.
- butlike 3y agoGPT as the victim.