4 ms·
> their mission isn't to create a browser Aaaand that's why I don't use Firefox.
by baal80spam 3y ago
> their mission isn't to create a browser
Aaaand that's why I don't use Firefox.
- LightHugger 3y agoAs long as you use something better, that isnt chrome. Chrome blatant spyware that scans your whole pc ever since google had the bright idea of sneaking an "antivirus" into chrome and enabling it by default. Firefox is better that chrome, but there's lots better than firefox.
- macspoofing 3y ago>As long as you use something better, that isnt chrome. This is why it is critical to have a meaningful alternative. Developers and end-users are pragmatic - all things being equal they will choose privacy and openness, but not at the expense of performance and capabilities. This is why it is so perplexing seeing Mozilla just focus on everything except for the one thing that gives them relevance and is actually important.
- sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y agoWhat would be an example of something better that isn’t chromium based?
- LightHugger 3y agoChromium based browsers and firefox forks are the two big pillars. The comment i replied to doesnt like firefox, so i would probably suggest ungoogled chromium or brave. For non chromium based, librewolf is a clear winner for me. Waterfox is also good. Hardened firefox is also okayish but not ideal.
- outwit 3y agoThat makes you part of the problem.
- Levitz 3y agoNo. It makes Mozilla part of the problem. People getting tired of Mozilla's incompetence and stopping supporting them is just a consequence of that. I use Firefox. I want to use Firefox. That Mozilla insists on pretending it's not the one single worthwhile thing they do doesn't make it easy.