4 ms·
AFAIK the IP deal with Microsoft only covers development before AGI. So at any point OpenAI could declare that a sufficient degree of AGI has been achieved and
by jpfr 3y ago
AFAIK the IP deal with Microsoft only covers development before AGI.
So at any point OpenAI could declare that a sufficient degree of AGI has been achieved and thus return to its philanthropic mission. With GPLed models and all.
However, at this point the employees expect a multi-million cash-out for each of them. So the philanthropic mission seems to be gone out the window.
And probably that’s also the way Sam Altman got back into the CEO role. By maximizing the expected eventual cash-out for the employees which threatened to leave otherwise.
- Racing0461 3y ago> OpenAI could declare that a sufficient degree of AGI has been achieved and thus return to its philanthropic mission The response from MSFT's legal team would be biblical if openai pulled this.
- edgyquant 3y agoIt’s literally in the contract such a distinction is at OpenAIs discretion
- jackdaniel 3y agoTechnically firing CEO was also at the board's discretion, so I'm dubious whether that means anything at this point.
- Racing0461 3y agoThe lawsuit won't be about the clause, it would be about the definition of AGI.
- edgyquant 3y agoLuckily MS is now on the board so they’ll have a say in when AGI is declared