3 ms·
There are a lot of undesirable side effects with that solution. You shouldn't have to be tech savvy enough to host a shopping experience that's competitive wit
by __MatrixMan__ 3y ago
There are a lot of undesirable side effects with that solution.
You shouldn't have to be tech savvy enough to host a shopping experience that's competitive with Amazon in order to sell things online. You ought to be able to focus solely on your product and if it's a good one you ought to be able to compete with Amazon Basics on a level playing field--even if it's a field served by Amazon metal.
I think we need more separation between the part of Amazon that handles clicking "buy" and printing shipping labels, and the part that comes up with things for sale. So much separation, in fact, that the former considers the latter to be no more trustworthy than any other company or individual.
Seller reputation should be important, and the medium for determining if a seller is trustworthy should be free from conflicts of interest.
If the user facing part was adequately adversarial about the cardboard facing part it would result in a UI which had no reason to encourage the user to trust the contents of the cardboard, and instead simply presented facts that enable the user to apply their own scrutiny.
- tadfisher 3y agoCan Amazon even run FBA without comingling? This is the root of the problem; tracing an individual item back to the seller is apparently not possible, so seller reputation doesn't really exist. So either it's not a big enough problem for Amazon to kill comingling, or it's not profitable to do so at Amazon's scale.
- __MatrixMan__ 3y agoI'm pretty sure that if we manage to coordinate an existential threat to Amazon, Amazon will respond by finding a way to do it profitably. The problem is that we're not threatening enough because we're uncoordinated.