3 ms·
The intended result is clearly to supplant other information sources in favor of people getting their information from ChatGPT. Why should it matter to legality
by jprete 3y ago
The intended result is clearly to supplant other information sources in favor of people getting their information from ChatGPT. Why should it matter to legality that the tech isn't good enough for the goal?
- stale2002 3y ago> T. Why should it matter to legality that the tech isn't good enough for the goal? Because if it is not good enough, then it is not a market substitute. The laws cares if it is a market substitute and if there are damages. If it sucks, then there aren't damages, which matters for the 4th factor of fair use.