So it is either that US company got better work done at cheaper price. Means win for US as it got a tiny bit competitive. That'd be pro-market argument. Or ano

So it is either that US company got better work done at cheaper price. Means win for US as it got a tiny bit competitive. That'd be pro-market argument. Or another way that if US company has decided to not employ US born local at least those got employed overseas will not compete for housing, schools and other services for which they easily out compete locals if they are employed in US. Means another win. That would be pro-nativist argument. I know they are not much loved here but that's that.