3 ms·

It's more than a semantic difference. The only person with a right to occupy a private person is the owner. Everyone else does so at their discretion. I kind o

It's more than a semantic difference. The only person with a right to occupy a private person is the owner. Everyone else does so at their discretion. I kind of hear your point about smoking and the fact that we do sometimes regulate certain aspects of these spaces, but I'm not aware of any leash laws, at least in my area, that apply to indoor private spaces. And I don't mean that just in the sense that "it's not against the law, so to heck with you." You draw a parallel between smoking and a wandering dog (with more snark than was necessary, IMO), but "one of these things is not like the other" as they say.

maximinus_thrax 3y ago
> The only person with a right to occupy a private person is the owner. Everyone else does so at their discretion. Not entirely sure why you wrote this, it does not invalidate what I said ("Private business or publicly owned spaces, people do have access to it, unless asked to leave"). More details here: https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/access-private-property https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/access-private-property For this conversation, it does not matter. Everyone is free to enter the salon (there is no guard at the door, there is no entry fee, there is no key access, etc..) until asked to leave. > "one of these things is not like the other" I agree. One has the possibility of killing a person in a couple of years, another one can kill a person on the spot.