Humans are defined not just by their abilities but by their limitations too. We celebrate our achievements because sometimes they surpass the limitations of an

Humans are defined not just by their abilities but by their limitations too. We celebrate our achievements because sometimes they surpass the limitations of an average human. Our collective human limitations(physical, mental and temporal) are sort of invisible implicit rules that we all follow in one way or the other. If an entity is not bound by those rules then I don't see why that entity should be treated the same as a human. Companies already make this differentiation. For example take captcha and bot detection. Some of the heuristics are based on inherent human limitations like response time, click time, mouse acceleration etc. I doubt youtube or any other streaming service will be happy if you want to stream all their videos to train a hypothetical human like AI(which views and prepares notes like a human) at a hugely accelerated speed compared to a regular human. You can guess how quickly they will cite fair usage policies. What I want to say is there are fundamental differences between a human and an AI. So, we should not be quick to dismiss any concerns just because AI can "mimic" humans in certain areas.