5 ms·
Wow they want to kill it. I wonder if we've just lived through the golden Napster era of LLMs.
by downWidOutaFite 3y ago
Wow they want to kill it. I wonder if we've just lived through the golden Napster era of LLMs.
- readthenotes1 3y agoJust train on NYT articles no longer in copyright. We may be better for it.
- mynegation 3y agoNext thing you know ChatGPT gives you the best way to crank your automobile and take good care of your crinoline.
- vidarh 3y agoOr buy them. OpenAI market cap is many times NYT. If we see court judgements start to go copyright owners way, we will also see a scramble from AI companies to buy the few publishers with enough data to be worth buying, and to create works for hire to replace the rest. In the long run a copyright ruling like that will be a boon for OpenAI and all other players with deep enough pockets to do so, and massively harm everyone else who will suddenly find it far harder to build models legally.
- rhdunn 3y agoSo that would mean articles from the 1920s, provided that the authors of those articles have been dead for 70 years, or longer in some other countries.
- suby 3y agoThey may just want a licensing deal.
- weikju 3y agoThey're already working on it with Apple (see my other reply in this discussion), so I wouldn't doubt that this is another salvo in the same battle.