4 ms·
> should not be called open source, just like any restrictive license are you saying that licenses that guarantee users' permission to see the source code even
by fsckboy 3y ago
> should not be called open source, just like any restrictive license
are you saying that licenses that guarantee users' permission to see the source code even if it's reused are "open source" licenses, and whereas licenses that allow code to be reused and distributed without allowing users to see that source are restrictive and not open source? I agree.