Considering the FSF refuses to remove a voting board member who has repeatedly and zealously spoken up on behalf of pedophilia and in defense of pedophiles, I t

Considering the FSF refuses to remove a voting board member who has repeatedly and zealously spoken up on behalf of pedophilia and in defense of pedophiles, I think we can also dismiss them as having any sort of rational or defensible moral or ethical position. (I highly recommend https://drewdevault.com/2023/11/25/2023-11-26-RMS-on-sex.html https://drewdevault.com/2023/11/25/2023-11-26-RMS-on-sex.htm... as required reading for anyone who has any commentary on the FSF.) Don't we, as a community of developers trying to make the world a better place and build software with lasting impact for humanity deserve better representation? Shouldn't we ask if the positions of these two extremely problematic organizations is really the path we should invest in? Like, I contribute to and support open source projects, and I release my own code currently under permissive licenses, generally. But when the core freedom is "able to be used for surveillance capitalism that pays for billionaires to build bunker mansions to survive the apocalypse they're creating", while we villainize the companies actually developing the code who try to open source their code and still let their developers eat, we have a set of "freedoms" that are actually chaining us all to our doom.