3 ms·
It’s an extremely poor example. It’s a multi phase project and for many years government didn’t provide any funding as it was not a priority. It’s not like they
by jeromegv 3y ago
It’s an extremely poor example. It’s a multi phase project and for many years government didn’t provide any funding as it was not a priority. It’s not like they were actively trying to build it for 47 years, they built multiple small parts of it through multiple phases but they were never trying to build the whole thing. It was just not anything important to complete.
- adastra22 3y agoThe criticism still stands. It should not take 47 years from recognition that a road is needed to actually building it.
- KMag 3y agoWhat if sections will be needed now, and it's easy enough to make a plan to eventually connect all of the parts as needed? Get the zoning work done to prevent anything over 2 stories tall being built over the planned route, and then build the various sections as needed/as budget is available. I'm not saying that's what happened, but I can see smart, modular, as-needed infrastructure projects being drawn out over decades like this.
- phatfish 3y agoThe irony of software engineers complaining about a project not being feature complete and on time.
- adastra22 3y agoWhen a project that should take 5 months takes 500 months, this isn't a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]