2 ms·
I think you mean that it's quite possible their lawyer estimated the value of interpreting the regulations wrongly was greater than the penalty.
by cyanydeez 3y ago
I think you mean that it's quite possible their lawyer estimated the value of interpreting the regulations wrongly was greater than the penalty.
- goodluckchuck 3y agoOr that it was morally justified as a means of self defense since the regulation was primarily intended to destroy the company as a means of sabotaging American industry.
- itsanaccount 3y agoWho meant to sabotage American industry?