4 ms·
What gate keeping? I just see a valid correction to your misstatement and your reaction reads like a defensive Karen wrote it.
by beardedwizard 3y ago
What gate keeping? I just see a valid correction to your misstatement and your reaction reads like a defensive Karen wrote it.
- kevincox 3y agoNot supporting a platform just because it may cause it may cause battery drain which may not even matter to plugged in users seems like gatekeeping.
- 0xDEADFED5 3y agoit's literally an open source MIT licensed hobby project. fork it and improve it and share here. complaining about it is kinda rude.
- jasonjmcghee 3y agoI don’t have an Intel Mac to test on- but you can absolutely just clone it and swap the config to Intel
- frfl 3y agoI have to agree. If you're interested in supporting Intel(x86/64), it's open source, and you sound like you have the hardware to add support for and test on Intel.
- beardedwizard 3y agoNot supporting? The commenter simply said it may cause battery drain. It is a discussion on the topic (both sides based purely on conjecture), and a relevant one. You disagreeing does not mean others are "gate keeping". Stop trying to weaponize trendy language and white knight this thread.
- kevincox 3y agoThe original README was claiming that relies on Apple Silicon and that they have configured builds to exclude other Apple platforms. I see it has been greatly softened now to "Only tested on Apple Silicon, and the release is Apple Silicon" which I think is quite reasonable. I have no problem with not supporting a platform because you have no interest or any other reason, but previously it was quite proud to not support it which is different.
- beardedwizard 3y agoRidiculous. You are working very hard to be offended.