4 ms·
>"or more square kilometers of land [...]" Technically you need to factor in the fact that a nuclear plant can be built relatively near the places where its po
by burnerburnito 3y ago
>"or more square kilometers of land [...]"
Technically you need to factor in the fact that a nuclear plant can be built relatively near the places where its power will be consumed; some mass of solar power in Nevada is highly inefficient for powering New York or Virginia, even if you built HVDC lines to cut down on total line losses, so you'll need to pick land tracts reasonably near battery banks that would in turn be near cities.
- angiosperm 3y agoInventing imaginary problems does not contribute to the discussion. Please use facts.
- stephenr 3y agoJust as well New York and Virginia have oodles of open ocean right at their doorstep to run multi-gigawatt wind farms I guess huh?
- fastball 3y agoWind isn't reliable.
- gustavus 3y agoYeah and all those people on the other side of the Appalachians can just take a hike, why do they need power anyway. They brought the problem on their selves with their dirty coal mining habits time for them to pay the price.
- stephenr 3y agoThe comment I replied to talked about getting power from Nevada to New York. I'm not American so I had to look at a map but it seems like the other side of the Appalachians from New York is... Ohio? Is there something about Ohio that means they have no atmospheric wind nor natural sunlight?