3 ms·
> It is "obviously" also a property. Nope, it is not. If it was a property, if would be everywhere true, and that's not really interesting, is it? > Did you c
by auggierose 3y ago
> It is "obviously" also a property.
Nope, it is not. If it was a property, if would be everywhere true, and that's not really interesting, is it?
> Did you consider how "makes sense" is implemented?
You are the implementation. Does most of Philosophy make sense to you?
- mistermann 3y ago> Nope, it is not. Yes it is. > If it was a property, if would be everywhere true It would only need to be true sometimes. > and that's not really interesting, is it? I think how humans generate and then perceive reality is extraordinarily interesting actually. >> Did you consider how "makes sense" is implemented? > You are the implementation. Then why are you acting if your implementation is correct? >Does most of Philosophy make sense to you? I've only read tiny portions, so no. How about yourself?