3 ms·
My experience was exactly the same. This is probably unfair, but I got the impression that the people who made Julia never actually.. used it? But of course tha
by smabie 3y ago
My experience was exactly the same. This is probably unfair, but I got the impression that the people who made Julia never actually.. used it? But of course that can't be true so maybe my work flow was just significantly different than theirs?
Not a fan of Python at all but now I just stick with that for my quant analysis. Tons of issues with Python too but atleast they are all known / well documented problems (also chatgpt knows pandas / matplotlib / python very well).
- markkitti 3y agoApparently ChatGPT does pretty well with Julia. https://www.stochasticlifestyle.com/chatgpt-performs-better-on-julia-than-python-and-r-for-large-language-model-llm-code-generation-why/ https://www.stochasticlifestyle.com/chatgpt-performs-better-... It does take some asking around to discover the optimal Julia workflow with Revise.jl, PkgTemplates.jl, VSCode settings/debugger, Pluto.jl, but now it's probably my best development experience. Julia 1.10 improves much of this as well.
- spekcular 3y agoIs the "optimal Julia workflow" written down anywhere?
- pdeffebach 3y agoMaybe [this](https://m3g.github.io/JuliaNotes.jl/stable/workflow/ https://m3g.github.io/JuliaNotes.jl/stable/workflow/)? The key is to work with modules, use Revise.jl, and Infiltrator.jl.
- xgdgsc 3y agohttps://modernjuliaworkflows.github.io/ https://modernjuliaworkflows.github.io/