3 ms·
> Didn't read the article, but existence is obviously not a property. It is "obviously" also a property. > But all too often Philosophy gets lost in intellect
by mistermann 3y ago
> Didn't read the article, but existence is obviously not a property.
It is "obviously" also a property.
> But all too often Philosophy gets lost in intellectual games which make no sense.
Did you consider how "makes sense" is implemented?
> Philosophy is a funny thing.
If you think philosophy is weird, you should check out reality!
- auggierose 3y ago> It is "obviously" also a property. Nope, it is not. If it was a property, if would be everywhere true, and that's not really interesting, is it? > Did you consider how "makes sense" is implemented? You are the implementation. Does most of Philosophy make sense to you?
- mistermann 3y ago> Nope, it is not. Yes it is. > If it was a property, if would be everywhere true It would only need to be true sometimes. > and that's not really interesting, is it? I think how humans generate and then perceive reality is extraordinarily interesting actually. >> Did you consider how "makes sense" is implemented? > You are the implementation. Then why are you acting if your implementation is correct? >Does most of Philosophy make sense to you? I've only read tiny portions, so no. How about yourself?