> Masks were a case of bad communication By the "experts" who according to themselves and the media are extremely good at comms. Why are you so invested in def

> Masks were a case of bad communication By the "experts" who according to themselves and the media are extremely good at comms. Why are you so invested in defending these people? Just hatred of the other side? > Monoclonal Antibody therapy doesn't work with Covid > Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein have been shown to have clinical benefits in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection > these products are not expected to be effective treatments or preventives for COVID-19 That's textbook cognitive dissonance right there. Monoclonal Antibody Therapy did show promise in treating COVID-19. It certainly didn't hurt anyone. You don't see the clear hand of public policy that attempted (and mostly succeeded) to create a monopoly on treatment for the drug companies? > And vaccines worked wonders, everybody who got two, or three, shots allowed anti-vaxxers to not get theirs and not catch a hard Covid strain regardless of that decision What wonders did it work? It's not effective at stopping transmission, so your statement comes across as a bit dated tbh. Why can't you admit that it didn't do what the state-level "public health experts" promised it would? You're just going to follow these people wherever they lead you no matter how many times they fail publicly? Edit: Whoever flagged my post above is breaking the HN rules but I'm not surprised. People are still very offended by perspectives that deviate from state-media narratives on this topic.