4 ms·
Our laws for carbon-based brains were designed pretty explicitly for carbon-based brains. Why assume these completely different things should be (legally) equiv
by itishappy 3y ago
Our laws for carbon-based brains were designed pretty explicitly for carbon-based brains. Why assume these completely different things should be (legally) equivalent despite only superficial similarities?
- tanseydavid 3y agoTo me, the similarities do NOT seem superficial in any way.
- itishappy 3y agoI'd argue you're not looking very deep. On a physical level, chips and brains are entirely dissimilar. Some algorithms may share the same names, but that's about it. Brains aren't doing matrix multiplications all the time and chips don't use the Krebs cycle.
- nickthegreek 3y agoIn America, companies are people, no brain required and are protected in many ways because of that classification.