4 ms·
That is a new definition of intelligence that you are using. You are saying that even when something can outperform humans in the SAT or other tests of intellig
by gitfan86 3y ago
That is a new definition of intelligence that you are using. You are saying that even when something can outperform humans in the SAT or other tests of intelligence, it isn't actually intelligent due to it not being a carbon based lifeform
- discreteevent 3y agoNo. I gave the example of a bullshitter - who is usually a carbon based life form.
- Xelynega 3y agoOutperforming on the SAT(a test that the model was trained on) doesn't seem like a marker of intelligence as much as it is of recall.