The nature article is paywalled so it's impossible to see what they actually did, and the abstract is not very clear either. What benefit did they get from who

The nature article is paywalled so it's impossible to see what they actually did, and the abstract is not very clear either. What benefit did they get from whole-genome sequencing, for example? Additionally, it can't be called an antibiotic until it goes through the necessary human clinical trials, where all kinds of problems can crop up - they don't seem to provide any evidence that their AI-enabled scan for human cell toxicity actually worked. Finally, the real problem with antibiotic resistance is that microbes always evolve resistance over time if the antibiotics are overused (i.e prophylactic use in industrial animal agribusiness, and careless prescriptions of antibiotics from doctors).