Good grief. I don't build nuclear power plants, and even I absolutely know the difference even if I am sometimes sloppy with my terminology Certainly the peop

Good grief. I don't build nuclear power plants, and even I absolutely know the difference even if I am sometimes sloppy with my terminology Certainly the people building plants know the difference, so just stop it. > You are ignoring most of that. No I am not. In fact, I have dealt with that in what I wrote here. You have just chosen to ignore all these facts. Prime example: > > The fact is that nuclear plants take around 7.5 years to build. > I thought we debunked that No "we" didn't "debunk" that. Because it happens to be true, so there is nothing to debunk. It is just as true if you look at the last 50 years as it is if you look at the reactors just completed in 2022. You just refuse to look at the actual data, and instead focus on your gut feelings and then cherry pick a few outliers that confirm your gut feelings. Not entirely coincidentally, this is the same "methodology" that's used by other science-deniers to "prove" that homeopathy works. It doesn't. And nuclear power plants take an average of 7.5 years to construct. https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/nuclear-construction-time https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/nuclear-constructi... https://www.statista.com/statistics/712841/median-construction-time-for-reactors-since-1981/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/712841/median-constructi...