4 ms·

On the other hand this is sort of like saying, you already spend hundreds of dollars on unnecessary entertainment and other discretionary spending so you should

On the other hand this is sort of like saying, you already spend hundreds of dollars on unnecessary entertainment and other discretionary spending so you shouldn't be complaining when a new mandatory "entertainment tax" is established. Whether a business (or a person) is accepting of any given set of losses does not obligate them to be accepting of further losses.

ffgjgf1 3y ago
> further losses Losses that are generally compensated by the government
- tpmoney 3y ago
  Eminent domain requires the government to compensate you for your losses too, that doesn't usually make people happy about the losses.
  - ffgjgf1 3y ago
    Sheep are generally fungible, land and real estate not so much
BeetleB 3y ago
Quite an unrelated point. This isn't asking them to spend more on what they're already spending on. It's about them claiming something that isn't true. The data indicates they really don't care that much about their cattle.