2 ms·

I don't get this position, chicken and rice soup is not the most relevant result for the query rice but it is a match. It should show up in the results somewher

• thaumasiotes 3y ago
  > I don't get this position, chicken and rice soup is not the most relevant result for the query rice but it is a match. As I said, that is inconsistent with your simultaneous position that alcohol-free wine is not a match for "alcohol". Either they both are matches to their respective queries or they both aren't; there isn't a difference between the two examples. This is true from the perspective of dumb text searches, but it's equally true from the perspective of correct linguistic parsing. That rice is part of the listed title for chicken and rice soup is a coincidence; the argument for returning it also tells you that you should return the same soup when asked for "tomatoes", if tomatoes are an ingredient in the soup. Your "yes" and "no" examples don't seem to work. What rule excludes "licorice" that would include anything containing the raw textual string "rice" without regard to whether any rice is involved? Rice paper, rice cooker, cauliflower rice are all purely textual matches. Mochi is a purely semantic match!